devel

devel@lists.centos.org

16 participants
4590 discussions

CPE Weekly Update for Week 45 of 2022
by Akashdeep Dhar 11 Nov '22

11 Nov '22

Hi everyone, This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team. The report could be found at https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/?p=11591. If you want to receive weekly reports by email in the future, please subscribe to either https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/ or https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/c/news/commblog/61. We will stop sending them in the future. Regards, CPE Team

1 0

[Cloud SIG] CentOS Cloud SIG meeting minutes (2022-11-10)
by Alfredo Moralejo Alonso 10 Nov '22

10 Nov '22

====================================================== #centos-meeting: CentOS Cloud SIG meeting (2022-11-10) ====================================================== Meeting started by amoralej at 15:01:59 UTC. The full logs are available athttps://www.centos.org/minutes/2022/November/centos-meeting.2022-11-10-15… . Meeting summary --------------- * LINK: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/centos-cloud-sig (spotz, 15:02:22) * RDO/OpenStack update (amoralej, 15:05:31) * All packages for Zed release are built and final promotion is in CI (amoralej, 15:06:18) * LINK: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdoinfo/+/45965 (amoralej, 15:06:33) * LINK: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/puppet-openstack-integration/+/864194 (amoralej, 15:12:16) * LINK: https://review.rdoproject.org/paste/show/458/ (amoralej, 15:19:52) * LINK: https://logserver.rdoproject.org/65/45965/2/check/validate-buildsys-tags-ze… (amoralej, 15:23:28) * Documentation update (amoralej, 15:34:07) * LINK: https://pagure.io/projects/centos-sig-cloudsig/* (amoralej, 15:38:16) * a new repository has been created for Cloud SIG documentation in https://pagure.io/centos-sig-cloud/documentation (amoralej, 15:44:02) * LINK: https://review.rdoproject.org/etherpad/p/cloud-11-22 (spotz, 15:56:54) Meeting ended at 16:08:46 UTC. Action Items ------------ Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * amoralej (98) * spotz (43) * centguard (4) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

1 0

Connect at FOSDEM
by Shaun McCance 09 Nov '22

09 Nov '22

Going to FOSDEM? Here are three things to know: 1) We will have a CentOS Connect on February 3, the Friday before FOSDEM. I'm waiting on a required legal review of the contract before the full announcement. But I know people are already making travel plans, so please plan on the extra day. 2) There will be a Distributions Devroom at FOSDEM on Sunday. I'm one of the organizers. The CFP will land soon. 3) I'm considering a web+docs hackfest in Brussels, probably just a single day, unless people really want more. For me, it would have to happen the Monday after FOSDEM. We have a lot of web and docs revamp stuff in the air. We won't do it all, but we can make a concrete plan and take home action items. Let me know if you're interested. Let me know if you're interested in attending. Thanks, Shaun

1 0

Alternative Images SIG kickoff
by Troy Dawson 08 Nov '22

08 Nov '22

The CentOS Alternative Images SIG is finally official.[1] Time to get things rolling. I have setup an IRC channel #centos-alt-images and a pagure group[2], along with a sig repo[3] to track issues and documentation. I have requested a weekly meeting[4], Tuesdays at 1600 UTC on #centos-meeting. It is currently weekly, but as things get setup we'll slow that down to bi-weekly and possibly monthly. We can also work on a better time, but for now, that's what we have. Everybody is welcome to join and contribute to the SIG. The current set of members is: * Troy Dawson * Neal Gompa * Robby Callicotte * Brian Stinson * Ondřej Budai * Davida Cavalca *Ali Erdinc Koroglu Roadmap and (Action) TODO List * SIG Setup ** Officially become a SIG (DONE) ** Determine when our meetings will be (DONE FOR NOW) *** Get them on the calendar (IN PROGRESS) ** Basic SIG Infrastructure setup *** IRC channel created (DONE) *** Git repo created (DONE) * Documentation Created ** Basic SIG documentation (STARTED) *** Configuration for creating images (NEED) *** Instructions for creating images (NEED) ** Configuration templates for members / potential members (NEED) ** Instructions for end users *** Where to get the images (NEED) *** How to use the images (NEED) * Infrastructure Setup * Install Imagebuilding setup in CentOS Stream and/or Fedora (NEED) * Live Image building setup in CentOS Stream and/or Fedora (NEED) * Images to Mirrors setup (NEED) If you see a NEED and know how to do it, let us know and we can get started on it. Troy [1] - https://git.centos.org/centos/board/issue/87 [2] - https://pagure.io/group/centos-sig-alt-images [3] - https://pagure.io/centos-sig-alt-images/sig [4] j- https://github.com/CentOS/Calendar/pull/60

4 7

Are CentOS Stream 8 package updates stalled?
by Greg Bailey 05 Nov '22

05 Nov '22

I've switched my CentOS Linux 8 workstation to CentOS Stream 8 quite some time ago, and haven't encountered too many issues doing so, but I'm curious as to why there haven't been any package updates that I can see in quite some time (since early October as far as I can see). With the new stream process, my understanding is that for feature and bugfix development, the process is: Git ---> CentOS Stream ---> RHEL (next minor version) But with security updates, it seems to be: Git ---> RHEL (current minor version) ---> RHEL rebuilds (Rocky, Alma, etc) I'm kind of surprised that my firefox and thunderbird builds still seem stuck at 91.13.0, when I've seen updates go by on the RHEL 8 channels with the newer firefox builds, etc. What is the flow for security updates to make it into CentOS Stream package repositories? Is there some documentation describing this that maybe I missed? I don't remember seeing this on the CPE newsletter either. Thanks, Greg

3 3

Gauging interest in Discourse
by Shaun McCance 02 Nov '22

02 Nov '22

Hi all, You might be aware that there is a CentOS category on the Fedora Discourse instance: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/c/centos/71 There have been some discussions about having a dedicated Discourse instance for CentOS. Discourse has a lot of advantages, such as better moderation and integration with our accounts system. But I understand that many people are comfortable with their existing workflows. There's no point in running Discourse if it doesn't get enough buy-in. So I'm asking for input on using Discourse for various things: * Project announcements, like events, meetings, and infra changes * Activity reports, such as for SIGs and events * User support, replacing forums.centos.org * Development of Stream itself, basically centos-devel * Development of stuff inside SIGs * Replacement for the comments section of the blog * Alternatively, just replacing the blog entirely * Something else I'm not thinking of Thanks, Shaun McCance CentOS Community Architect Red Hat Open Source Program Office

5 18

CPE Weekly Update – Week 43 2022
by Lenka Segura 28 Oct '22

28 Oct '22

*Hi everyone,This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team.The report could be found at https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/cpe-weekly-update-week-43-2022 <https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/cpe-weekly-update-week-43-2022>/.If you want to receive weekly reports by emails in the future, please subscribe to either https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/ <https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/> or https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/c/news/commblog/61 <https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/c/news/commblog/61>. We will stop sending them in 2023.Regards,CPE Team*

1 0

Re: [CentOS-devel] kernel-5.14.0-171.el9.x86_64 / Not bootable (EFI) after Firmware update
by Leon Fauster 28 Oct '22

28 Oct '22

Am 08.10.22 um 16:24 schrieb Leon Fauster: > Hey folks, I wonder if anyone also suffers from the following: > > I updated the BIOS/Firmware of a DELL notebook from 1.8 to 1.9. and > after this the latest C9S > > kernel-5.14.0-171.el9.x86_64 > > can't be booted anymore (secure boot on) but the two older ones do boot: > > kernel-5.14.0-165.el9.x86_64 > kernel-5.14.0-168.el9.x86_64 > > The grub error message when trying to boot kernel-5.14.0-171.el9.x86_64 > looks like: > > error: ../../grub-core/kern/efi/sb.c:183:bad shim signature. > error: ../../grub-core/loader/i386/efi/linux.c:259:you need to load the > kernel first. > > I wonder how this happens. The firmware is classified as bug-fix update. > > Not sure if DBX list was update. fwupdmgr shows "Current version: 83" > If so, it does not make sense that older kernels can be used to boot the > system. So, a big question mark how to solve this issue? Any hints ...? > > > # sha256sum /boot/efi/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI > 3ae459e79408b5287ce70c5b86ddcc92c243c7442d6769a330390598b7a351b1 > /boot/efi/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI > It seems that the kernel-5.14.0 of the release 17X-series do not get signed with the CentOS key anymore! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138019 TLDR: /boot/vmlinuz-5.14.0-16* versus /boot/vmlinuz-5.14.0-17* shows The signer's common name is CentOS Secure Boot Signing 201 versus The signer's common name is Red Hat Test Certificate Is this issue already receiving the right attention? -- Thanks Leon

1 0

CPE Weekly Update - Week 42 2022
by Michal Konecny 21 Oct '22

21 Oct '22

Hi everyone, This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team. The report could be found at https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/ cpe-weekly-update---week-42-2022/ <https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/?p=11495>. If you want to receive weekly reports by emails in the future, please subscribe to either https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/ or https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/c/news/commblog/61. We will stop sending them in the future. Regards, CPE Team

1 0

Renaming Dojos
by Shaun McCance 19 Oct '22

19 Oct '22

Hi all, The CentOS Board is looking at renaming Dojos, our series of free mini- conferences. Please give your input on this Discussion post: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/renaming-centos-dojos/43351 Note that Fedora and CentOS share an accounts system, so if you have a CentOS account, you already have a login for Fedora Discussion. Thanks, Shaun

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel