devel

devel@lists.centos.org

4 participants
4640 discussions

yumex-0.99.6-2.0.c4 for CentOS 4 i386 and x86_64 is now in Testing
by Johnny Hughes 12 Feb '06

12 Feb '06

yumex-0.99.6-2.0.c4.noarch.rpm is now in the test repository: Name : yumex Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 0.99.6 Vendor: CentOS Release : 2.0.c4 Build Date: Sun 12 Feb 2006 06:15:39 AM CST Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: x8664-build.centos.org Group : Applications/System Source RPM: yumex-0.99.6-2.0.c4.src.rpm Size : 1007309 License: GPL Signature : DSA/SHA1, Sun 12 Feb 2006 06:17:36 AM CST, Key ID a53d0bab443e1821 Packager : Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> URL : http://linux.rasmil.dk/yumex Summary : Yum Extender graphical package management tool Description : Graphical User Interface for Yum. yumex is available for install via the command: yum --enablerepo c4-testing install yumex If you don't have the testing repository installed, you can get the .repo file from http://dev.centos.org/centos/4/CentOS-Testing.repo and put it in /etc/yum.repo.d/ Then use the above yum command to get yumex. There is a tracker setup here for reporting feedback. Please provide both positive and negative install info, as we need positive reports to move items from testing to stable: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1210 Thanks, Johnny Hughes

1 0

Building a custom 2.6.9 kernel
by William L. Thomson Jr. 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

Greetings all, A little upset because of some very rude people in IRC, on freenode.net. That accused me of trolling and made it so I can't say anything in the channel. More on that later. Here is the deal, I am in the process of installing Gentoo on a AMD64 server. I messed up and bought the wrong SATAII Raid card, Adaptec 142SA. Which only has binary drivers for RH, SuSE, and UL. 32bit and 64bit modules. Now having tried all kinds of kernels. I started looking for RH kernel sources. Which is basically what CentOS provides. I started with the kernel-2.6.9-22.EL.src.rpm After messing with that for days, patches and all. I decided to give the kernel-devel rpms a go. So I downloaded kernel-devel-2.6.9-22.EL.i686.rpm kernel-devel-2.6.9-22.EL.x86_64.rpm Used rpm2targz, and converted them into tarballs which I unpacked. I then moved the sources from usr/lib/kernel, entered the kernel source dir, configured and compiled fine. With the i686 version. When I attempt to do the same with the x86_64 one I get wlt 2.6.9-22.EL # make bzImage ARCH=x86_64 V=1 if /usr/bin/env test ! /usr/src/2.6.9-22.EL -ef /usr/src/2.6.9-22.EL; then \ /bin/sh /usr/src/2.6.9-22.EL/scripts/mkmakefile \ /usr/src/2.6.9-22.EL /usr/src/2.6.9-22.EL 2 6 \ > /usr/src/2.6.9-22.EL/Makefile; \ fi CHK include/linux/version.h CHK include/asm-x86_64/offset.h make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/mod make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=init make[1]: *** No rule to make target `init/main.o', needed by `init/built-in.o'. Stop Now I came across this posting http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1110 And have heard from others that the preferred way to build RH kernels now is to rebuild an rpm using the src rpm. Which I have never done, but I have been making custom RH kernels since 6.2 or so. Always using the kernel-devel package? Now on IRC my main question was has anyone built a custom x86_64 kernel? I believe the reason I was booted, because I asked the same person (kbsingh) that question 3 times. Because they never answered, which leads me to believe they have not. Instead they called me a troll and made it so I can't say anything in the channel. Very rude and totally unprofessional. I thought CentOS was a enterprise community distro. Amazing to find that kind of attitude. Furthermore they were questioning what I did with the kernel-devel to build a custom kernel in the first place. Since they claimed it to be only headers not a full source? So I provided links and etc. http://dev.obsidian-studios.com/kernel-devel-2.6.9-22.EL.i686.rpm http://dev.obsidian-studios.com/kernel-devel-2.6.9-22.EL.i686.tar.gz http://dev.obsidian-studios.com/working-2.6.9-11.EL.tar.gz http://dev.obsidian-studios.com/2.6.9-11.EL.config.working Now I have been downloading all rpms from http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/centos/ I really need to build a 2.6.9.11.EL x86_64 kernel. I have a working i686 one, links above. But the kernel-devel-2.6.9-22.EL.x86_64.rpm Seems to be missing stuff that is in the i686 one. Like if you do not properly change dir name from 2.6.9-22.EL.x86_64 to 2.6.9-22.EL you can't compile asm-offsets. http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2005-April/004499.html However that was not a problem with the i686 sources? The asm-offsets file is provide in i686 kernel-dev rpm and src rpm. The missing x86_64 stuff is not in either kernel-dev or src rpms. Interesting enough, all the missing stuff exists by default with Gentoo sources. I am really trying to avoid rebuilding a rpm. That would require me to install and setup a CentOS or RHEL box. Which seems a bit much just to build a custom kernel. Considering the kernel will be used for another distro. Please anyone running CentOS with a custom x86_64 kernel, I would love to hear the processes. Now reason I am posting to dev list and not users, is it seems users are discouraged to build their own kernels as opposed to developers. Who have to make the resulting rpms as it is. Thoughts, comments, and things of a constructive nature are all greatly appreciated. Hopefully I will not find the same attitude here as in the irc channel. That type of behavior would keep someone like my who does not run or use CentOS, totally away from it. Gentoo people care less if I ask questions about building a custom centos kernel for Gentoo. Not sure why CentOS people would have a problem with my questions. Considering I am not asking anything about Gentoo, or that aspect of it. Just how to get a custom x86_64 kernel built using CentOS 2.6.9-22 sources. Thanks a million. -- Sincerely, William L. Thomson Jr. Obsidian-Studios, Inc. http://www.obsidian-studios.com

9 24

GFS Update for CentOS 3
by John Newbigin 01 Feb '06

01 Feb '06

4 3

Problems installing compat-postgresql-libs-3-3.c4.centos.x86_64.rpm for x86_64
by Scott Brandhuber 30 Jan '06

30 Jan '06

trying to yum install compat-postgresql-libs from c4-testing results in several dependecy errors. says it needs to install the following packages: e2fsprogs i386 1.35-12.2.EL4 base 770 k glibc i686 2.3.4-2.13 base 5.0 M krb5-libs i386 1.3.4-17 base 478 k openssl i686 0.9.7a-43.4 update 1.1 M zlib i386 1.2.1.2-1.2 base 44 k the x86_64 versions of all these are already installed. I do not have any i386 or i686 packages currently installed Scott --------------------------------- Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less

3 3

reiserfs quota
by Jure Pečar 30 Jan '06

30 Jan '06

Hi all, Is there a possibility to get quota patches for reiserfs in the "unsupported" centos 3 (and maybe 4) kernel? If I do the patching myself, what's the official procedure to get them included in your kernel? http://www.namesys.com/faq.html#quota -- Jure Pečar http://jure.pecar.org

1 0

thunderbird 1.5 srpm for review
by matt whiteley 25 Jan '06

25 Jan '06

I needed to build this for our environment. I tried to follow the form of the centos plus testing firefox rpm. Let me know if anyone has comments. http://www.cat.pdx.edu/~mattw/srpms/thunderbird-1.5-1.c4.centos4.src.rpm thanks, -- matt whiteley <mattw(a)cat.pdx.edu>

2 1

centosplus unsupported kernel
by Phil Schaffner 22 Jan '06

22 Jan '06

Just updated to the new 2.6.9-22.0.2.106.unsupported kernel (don't see an Announce entry yet, but yum sees it) and found an apparently-minor glitch in the gcc version when updating my VMware Workstation kernel module: # vnware-config.pl ... snip ... Using compiler "/usr/bin/gcc". Use environment variable CC to override. Your kernel was built with "gcc" version "3.4.5", while you are trying to use "/usr/bin/gcc" version "3.4.4". This configuration is not recommended and VMware Workstation may crash if you'll continue. Please try to use exactly same compiler as one used for building your kernel. Do you want to go with compiler "/usr/bin/gcc" version "3.4.4" anyway? [no] yes What is the location of the directory of C header files that match your running kernel? [/lib/modules/2.6.9-22.0.2.106.unsupported/build/include] ... snip ... Despite the warning, the build finishes and VMware seems to work OK so far. Checked testing repo for a gcc update and didn't see one. Phil

3 3

This might be of interest to CentOS developers
by Alexandru E. Ungur 17 Jan '06

17 Jan '06

Hi, My fiance (who was recently converted to CentOS ;) from Slackware) found something that intrigued us both. You may want to read this: http://rentacoder.com/RentACoder/misc/BidRequests/ShowBidRequest.asp?lngBid… I quote: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Description: The summary of the project is to create a distribution similar to CentOS Linux which is nearly the same as Red Hat Linux - with the exception that Red Hat's graphic images and name have been removed in areas to prevent legal issues. We already have a distribution similar to CentOS with the appropriate graphic files already developed. However, it is now old and needs to be updated.'" [..] "You should actually be able to use the CentOS Linux distribution as your starting point to minimize work efforts." [..] "Deliverables: [..] 3) All deliverables will be considered "work made for hire" under U.S. Copyright ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ law. Buyer will receive exclusive and complete copyrights to all work purchased. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ (No GPL, GNU, 3rd party components, etc. unless all copyright ramifications are explained AND AGREED TO by the buyer on the site per the coder's Seller Legal Agreement)." --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- end of quote. It seems stupid to duplicate something that already exists and works *very* well (great distro you guys!)... unless I'm missing something. It just pisses me off that somebody could take your work just like that and use it for **unfair** purposes! BTW, you can talk to RAC people if the proposed projects are unfair/illegal which I suspect it is the case here. Have a nice day everyone, Alex

4 5

FireFox 1.5 for CentOS4 i386 and x86_64 now in Testing
by Karanbir Singh 13 Jan '06

13 Jan '06

Firefox 1.5 is now avaialble for CentOS4 on i386 and x86_64 in the Testing repository. on i386: -------------------------------------------------------------- Name : firefox Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 1.5 Vendor: CentOS Release : 1.c4.centos4 Build Date: Sat 03 Dec 2005 03:04:48 AM UTC Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: guru.build.karan.org Group : Applications/Internet Source RPM: firefox-1.5-1.c4.centos4.src.rpm Size : 22656510 License: MPL/LGPL Signature : DSA/SHA1, Sat 03 Dec 2005 04:19:41 PM UTC, Key ID 5c37c0b17203f491 Packager : Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)karan.org> URL : http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Summary : Mozilla Firefox Web browser. Description : Mozilla Firefox is an open-source web browser, designed for standards compliance, performance and portability. on x86_64 --------------------------------------------------------------- Name : firefox Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 1.5 Vendor: CentOS Release : 1.c4.centos4 Build Date: Sun 04 Dec 2005 07:02:48 PM UTC Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: monk.karan.org Group : Applications/Internet Source RPM: firefox-1.5-1.c4.centos4.src.rpm Size : 29512530 License: MPL/LGPL Signature : DSA/SHA1, Sun 04 Dec 2005 11:41:18 PM UTC, Key ID 5c37c0b17203f491 Packager : Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)karan.org> URL : http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Summary : Mozilla Firefox Web browser. Description : Mozilla Firefox is an open-source web browser, designed for standards compliance, performance and portability. Sources : http://dev.centos.org/centos/4/testing/SRPMS/firefox-1.5-1.c4.centos4.src.r…

9 11

New squid-2.5.STABLE11-3 packages available in Centos-Testing for i386 and x86_64
by Jim Perrin 12 Jan '06

12 Jan '06

New squid packages for version 2.5.STABLE11-3 are available in the CentOS-Testing repository for the i386 and x86_64 architectures. This package includes several fixes from upstream for DNS lookups, delay pools, FTP response crashes and several others. Please give it a try and remember to report feedback. Feedback for this package should be added to the tracking ticket here: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1168 The Centos-Testing repository can be added using this .repo file -> http://dev.centos.org/centos/4/CentOS-Testing.repo Package names: squid-2.5.STABLE11-3.c4.i386.rpm squid-2.5.STABLE11-3.c4.src.rpm squid-2.5.STABLE11-3.c4.x86_64.rpm squid-debuginfo-2.5.STABLE11-3.c4.i386.rpm squid-debuginfo-2.5.STABLE11-3.c4.x86_64.rpm

2 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

devel