Hi,
We have a CentOS 7 -based (more accurately, CentOS 7 atomic
host-based) distro that we build and run on specialized hardware. For
the kernel, we pick the CentOS 7 kernel, apply two patches (and a
different configuration) and build it. We're mostly following CentOS
7.8 at the moment, and using the 3.10.0-1127.13.1 kernel.
A few days ago, I noticed kernel-3.10.0-1127.18.2.el7 was out (and
it's labeled as a security update -
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2020-July/035780.html)
so I decided to build it. Our kernel build process involves
downloading the src.rpm, patching the spec and then calling rpmbuild.
For this latest kernel, our spec patch (which adds our 2 patches)
failed to apply - as far as I can tell, the hunks where patches are
listed, like this one:
==
@@ -449,6 +449,8 @@
Patch1000: debrand-single-cpu.patch
Patch1001: debrand-rh_taint.patch
Patch1002: debrand-rh-i686-cpu.patch
+Patch88881: kernel_ixia.patch
+Patch88882: at24.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/kernel-%{KVRA}-root
==
I checked the new spec file, and the debrand patches are missing.
Looking at https://git.centos.org/rpms/kernel/commits/c7 (let me know
if that's the right place), I see there's a debranding change
(https://git.centos.org/rpms/kernel/c/548139faa91edfe29fc84695da827230de3c5d…)
but it simply added a README saying debranding failed.
Do I need to wait for a new change fixing this? I see older kernels
have a "debranding" commit and then a "Manual CentOS Debranding"
commit, is something like that required now as well?
Thanks in advance,
Stefan.
Hi folks,
What is the best way to get /usr/bin/cbs and the corresponding Koji
profile config on Fedora?
I'm wondering if we should package centos-packager in Fedora. My
concern is that pull requests are not merged upstream at
https://github.com/bstinsonmhk/centos-packager/pull/3
- Ken
Due to a hardware issue, we'll have to move the existing NFS share used
by cbs.centos.org to a new node.
Migration is scheduled for """"Thursday August 5th, 6:30 am UTC time"""".
You can convert to local time with $(date -d '2020-08-05 6:30 UTC')
The expected "downtime" is estimated to ~30 minutes , time needed to
stop services, reflect change for NFS storage, update dns A record , and
ansible restarting the whole process.
During that downtime, nothing will be processed on the koji builders
(nor signed and pushed out to mirror CDN)
Thanks for your comprehending and patience.
on behalf of the Infra team,
--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org
gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab
Hi all,
As you probably noticed in the last weeks/months, we have a stronger
collaboration and synergy with the Fedora infrastructure team. Combining
forces and resources help both projects at the same time, as majority of
the CentOS contributors are already Fedora contributors and probably the
same in reverse.
It's not a secret (it was announced through CPE weekly mails on this
list) that the CentOS board approved the idea of merging authentication
systems in a near future (as an example).
This email to let you know that all RFE/issues concerning the following
areas should be reported to a new issues tracker :
https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issues/ , to adapt the same workflow as
the Fedora infra team is already using. ( see
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/cpe/working_with_us/ )
Concerned areas :
- https://cbs.centos.org (Community BuildSystem, aka koji)
- Special Interest Groups requests (for mirror, resources, etc)
- https://ci.centos.org (All CI infra ecosystem)
- Everything around CentOS Infra (mirror issues, etc)
We have already moved/migrated for example the (opened) tickets that
were filed under the "Buildsys" , "CI" and "Infrastructure" categories
to the new issues tracker. The idea being to *not* request work to be
done through IRC but rather through new infra issues tracker.
Imported tickets will be discussed there and worked on (reviewed on a
daily basis) after having been prioritized
Should you feel a need to discuss this new process, feel free to do so
in #centos-devel on irc.freenode.net or on this centos-devel list.
Kind Regards,
--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org
gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab
Hi all,
I need sources for latest Centos 8.2 kernel (kernel-4.18.0-193.14.2.el8_2).
Since they are (now customarily) not available on vault.centos.org, I am attempting to build from git.centos.org.
However, I am unable to find the exact commit to build from.
On https://git.centos.org/rpms/kernel/commits/c8, I see 13.2 and 14.3, but not 14.2 that actually shipped.
$git log --format="%C(auto) %h %s" origin/c8 | head -n 20
08e2843 debrand kernel-4.18.0-193.14.3.el8_2
284ac7b import kernel-4.18.0-193.14.3.el8_2
f990a59 Manual CentOS Debranding
6694789 debrand kernel-4.18.0-193.13.2.el8_2
56933c6 import kernel-4.18.0-193.13.2.el8_2
efc1e5b Manual CentOS Debranding
afc068a debrand kernel-4.18.0-193.6.3.el8_2
d0c1e45 import kernel-4.18.0-193.6.3.el8_2
9af314c Manual CentOS Debranding
b36366f debrand kernel-4.18.0-193.1.2.el8_2
c6227ee import kernel-4.18.0-193.1.2.el8_2
063bbb9 change to centos.pem
05d7b37 Manual CentOS Debranding
9f8b3f1 debrand kernel-4.18.0-193.el8
78ffa6b import kernel-4.18.0-193.el8
89ceb16 Manual CentOS Debranding
47aeda1 debrand kernel-4.18.0-147.8.1.el8_1
e9cecf3 import kernel-4.18.0-147.8.1.el8_1
718e82b Manual CentOS Debranding
223d051 debrand kernel-4.18.0-147.5.1.el8_1
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Antal
seems the updated pushed recently to centos stream (I updated about an
hour ago) now cause my pc to hang after BIOS...it never gets to grub
could this be the GRUB_ENABLE_BLSCFG issue that has come downstream
from fedora ?
any advice would be most greatly appreciated thanks
Hi,
RHEL has also kernel-4.18.0-193.13.2.el8 released.
Will this kernel also be released for CentOS [1]?
Its the "latest" kernel before the grub/shim updates and
I would like to test some issues with machines
that do not boot the -193- kernels ...
Thanks,
Leon
[1] https://koji.mbox.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=12631
Hi, SIG members,
As you may be aware, the repo where your meeting schedules live is here:
git@github.com:CentOS/Calendar.git
The content there then gets generated into
https://www.centos.org/community/calendar/ and the associated ical file.
Many of the records in there are incorrect - either the meeting times,
or the SIG leader information, or both. Please have a look at the
generated page, and if your information is incorrect please either send
a PR to that git repo, or send me the information directly so that I can
correct it.
Thanks!
--Rich
=============================================
#centos-meeting: NFV SIG meeting - 2020-07-29
=============================================
Meeting started by amoralej at 15:01:05 UTC. The full logs are available
athttps://www.centos.org/minutes/2020/July/centos-meeting.2020-07-29-15.01.…
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* status of sig-nfv membership (amoralej, 15:06:24)
* LINK: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17629 (amoralej,
15:07:57)
* CBS tags and buildroot creation for nfv8-openvswitch-2 (amoralej,
15:11:11)
* CBS tags are created and ready to build (amoralej, 15:11:29)
* LINK: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17612 (amoralej,
15:12:30)
* nfvsig branches for openvswitch and ovn in git.centos.org (amoralej,
15:15:11)
* LINK: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17614 (amoralej,
15:15:54)
* build status (amoralej, 15:20:48)
* we'll need to disable unit tests for centos8 builds because of
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=16969 (amoralej, 15:23:19)
* NFV SIG documentation status (amoralej, 15:24:27)
* LINK:
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2020-July/055940.html
(amoralej, 15:29:26)
* ACTION: tfherbert to review goals and references to opnfv in nfv sig
wiki (amoralej, 15:31:29)
* open floor (amoralej, 15:47:13)
* ACTION: cfontain to investigate on nfv specific tuned profiles
(amoralej, 16:02:56)
* ACTION: tfherbert to chair next meeting (amoralej, 16:05:18)
Meeting ended at 16:07:35 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* tfherbert to review goals and references to opnfv in nfv sig wiki
* cfontain to investigate on nfv specific tuned profiles
* tfherbert to chair next meeting
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* cfontain
* cfontain to investigate on nfv specific tuned profiles
* tfherbert
* tfherbert to review goals and references to opnfv in nfv sig wiki
* tfherbert to chair next meeting
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* amoralej (172)
* tfherbert (28)
* cfontain (19)
* dholler (14)
* ykarel (10)
* centbot (4)
* rbowen (2)
* gwd (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot