Are they any known issues in booting kernel
4.18.0-193.6.3.el8_2.x86_64 (8.2 (2004)) with
secure boot enabled?
I have this issue
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2020-June/350702.html
and wonder if the qa team has found any problem?
The corresponding kernel-plus also doesn't boot ...
--
Thanks
Leon
On 16/06/2020 08:49, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 12:00 PM Fabian Arrotin <arrfab(a)centos.org
<snip>
>
> The AMIs listed in
>
> https://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS
> are not the same as from Amazon search results.
>
> what could be the issue?
> -
> Lee
>
I hope you don't trust directly what's coming from that search box,
where plenty of people have tagged something like a centos image before
we even had one there :)
Just use the AMI ID for now
--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org
gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab
RHEL 8.2 and CentOS 8.2 have an updated qt5. This updated qt5 allowed
us to update the KDE Plasma Desktop in EPEL8. We are not at the
following versions.
qt5 - 5.12
plasma - 5.18 [1]
kf5 - 5.68 / 19.12
apps - 5.18 / 19.12
Installation Instructions:
### First: install epel-release
rpm -Uvh https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/epel-release-latest-8.noarch.rpm
### Second: Enable codeready-builder or PowerTools
subscription-manager repos --enable codeready-builder-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms
#### If CentOS 8 do
dnf config-manager --enable PowerTools
#### If CentOS Stream do
dnf config-manager --enable Stream-PowerTools
### Third: install KDE
dnf group install "KDE Plasma Workspaces"
or
dnf group install kde-desktop
(Optional) dnf group install kde-media
(Optional) dnf group install kde-apps
(Optional) dnf install okular
### (Optional) Fourth: Set sddm as desktop manager
### Required if you started from a minimal install
systemctl set-default graphical.target [if in multi-user.target]
dnf install sddm\*
systemctl enable sddm -f
reboot
### (Optional) If you installed in GNOME
systemctl reload gdm
Known Issues:
Several (about 50%) settings do not work in System Settings.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838801
Help resolving this bug would be appreciated.
It is irritating, but not critical.
Many thanks to all who helped with this.
Troy Dawson
[1] plasma-nm is currently at 5.15. This has been verified to work.
We will hopefully be able to update it to 5.18 within a month.
Am 15.06.20 um 18:29 schrieb Brian Stinson:
> Release for CentOS Linux 8 (2004)
>
> We are pleased to announce the general availability of CentOS Linux 8.
> Effectively immediately, this is the current release for CentOS Linux 8
> and is tagged as 2004, derived
> from Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Source Code.
Great work! Thank you to all of the CentOS team!
> Information for the torrent files and sums are available at
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8/isos/
FYI: CHECKSUM.asc is missing for iso dir ...
--
Leon
---
title: CPE Weekly status email
tags: CPE Weekly, email
---
# CPE Weekly: 2020-06-14
Background:
The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining
IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Our goal is to keep
core servers and services running and maintained, build releases, and
other strategic tasks that need more dedicated time than volunteers
can give.
See our wiki page here for more
information:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/cpe/
## General Project Updates
Please check out our updated initiative timetable for briefing in new
projects to our team
here:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/cpe/time_tables/
*Note: Initiatives are large pieces of work that require a team of
people and weeks/months to complete. Please continue to open tickets
in the normal way for bugs, issues, etc.
Dont forget to view our taiga board to see the projects we are
currently working on, what we have scoped and whats in our backlog
https://tree.taiga.io/project/amoloney1-cpe-team-projects/kanban?epic=null
CPE Product Owner Office Hours
* Weekly on Thursdays @ 1300 UTC on #fedora-meeting-1
* Every second Tuesday @ 1500 UTC on #centos-meeting (next meeting 23rd June)
* Meeting Logs
* Fedora: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/cpe_product_owner_office_hours/cpe_…
* CentOS: https://www.centos.org/minutes/2020/June/centos-meeting.2020-06-09-15.00.lo…
## Fedora Updates
### Data Centre Move
* The final Fedora hardware shipment is due to happen on Tuesday 16th June.
* We expect the shipment to arrive in the new data centre the week
beginning 22nd June and the team will begin bringing up services that
are affected by the move.
* A list of affected services is available here
https://hackmd.io/hpYYJQRjQy-oHxUS7IonIA?view
* Please read the below email sent by kfenzi if you have not already
done so: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedorapr…
* Details on what this move may mean for you can be found here
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedorapr…
* If an application is not working correctly at all, please check this
list https://hackmd.io/hpYYJQRjQy-oHxUS7IonIA?view before opening a
ticket to make sure its not listed as being moved. If it is being
moved, please wait a day or two, then try again.
* Similarly, please be patient when opening tickets for service issues
in general as we have now reached the critical point in this move and
all of our sys-admins and wider teams will be assisting in the
successful bringup of the reduced Fedora service and facilitation of
the final hardware shipment and move.
### AAA Replacement
* The team are working on the changing application code bases to use
the new solution
* They are also working on the CentOS account integration and the
solution will see users be able to select the contributor agreements
that are relative to their account.
* They are also testing a script to use in data migration from the
current FAS system to Noggin to allow for very little, if any, changes
to the user
* The team are also completing user documentation that includes a
how-to migration guide for maintainers and a guide to help users
understand the differences between Noggin and the current FAS option
(issue #246 on board)
* Please feel free to check out the team kanban board for more
information on the features the team are working on and have already
completed here https://github.com/orgs/fedora-infra/projects/6
### Mbbox
* Project Dashboard here https://github.com/fedora-infra/mbbox/projects/1
* Tasks completed in the project currently
* MBS Backend CRD + documentation
* MBS Frontend CRD - configuration and certificates
* Draft of blog post about MBBox
* Tasks underway currently
* MBS Frontend CRD - deployment config and service
* Staging environment required
* MBox shared CRD
### Gitforge
With the data centre move taking most of the teams focus this week,
discussions with gitlab have been quiet. We are still discussing
technical aspects of the project and these are tracked here:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/217350
We will keep you up to date with the developments as and when we have
information to share and thank you for your patience.
## CentOS Updates
### CentOS
* OCP4 staging cluster in progress
* CentOS Linux 8.2.2004 content is in pre-release with more artifacts to come
* There was also a recent CentOS AMA on Reddit, logs are here so check
it out if you missed it
https://www.reddit.com/r/CentOS/comments/gwnvd2/centos_ama/
### CentOS Stream
* The team have been working really hard to get package sources pushed
to keep caught up with RHEL
* We are also working on tooling for more push automation
* And tooling for RealTime and other Variants are coming in Stream soon
As always, feedback is welcome, and we will continue to look at ways
to improve the delivery and readability of this weekly report.
Have a great week ahead!
Aoife
Source: https://hackmd.io/8iV7PilARSG68Tqv8CzKOQ?view
--
Aoife Moloney
Product Owner
Community Platform Engineering Team
Red Hat EMEA
Communications House
Cork Road
Waterford
Hi,
I am a user of CentOS 8.
When can we expect an image on AWS?
I am just learning AWS and would like to use CentOS 8 for that.
https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/CloudInstance
says that this is the list to ask.
thanks
---
Lee
Thanks a lot, I see it there now, I am just trying to build our downstream packages
Cheers
Jose
-----Original message-----
From: Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <amoralej(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 4:52 PM
To: The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel(a)centos.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Missing dependencies while rebuilding OpenStack packages
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 4:19 PM Jose Castro Leon <jose.castro.leon(a)cern.ch <mailto:jose.castro.leon@cern.ch> > wrote:
Hi,
This recipe worked like a charm, but now we are seeing again the same issue, openstack-macros is no longer available in ussuri nor in train
Could you please tell me what happened?
I see it in train repo:
$ repoquery --repofrompath=train,https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-train/build-deps/latest/--disablerepo="*" --enablerepo=train -q openstack-macros
openstack-macros-0:2019.2.3-1.el8.noarch
In ussuri it was missing after bootstrapping deps, I just added:
$ repoquery --repofrompath=ussuri,https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-ussuri/build-deps/latest/--disablerepo="*" --enablerepo=ussuri -q openstack-macros
openstack-macros-0:2019.2.3-1.el8.noarch
Best regards,
Alfredo
Cheers
Jose
-----Original message-----
From: Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <amoralej(a)redhat.com <mailto:amoralej@redhat.com> >
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 1:52 PM
To: The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel(a)centos.org <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org> >
Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Missing dependencies while rebuilding OpenStack packages
Hi,
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:44 PM Jose Castro Leon <jose.castro.leon(a)cern.ch <mailto:jose.castro.leon@cern.ch> > wrote:
Hi Cloud SIG,
With every OpenStack release (and also with CentOS 8), we have to rebuild some OpenStack packages to be installed at CERN.
Those packages carry downstream patches for integration into our environment. While building those, we have
observed that there are some packages that are required to build but are not provided in the testing repositories.
In the past, there was a build repository in which those dependencies were available. If I recall correctly from a previous
discussion, this is no longer available due to several reasons.
Would it be possible to have the dependencies available in the testing repo at least to build the main OpenStack components?
If this is not possible, what would be your suggestion to help us out?
Since some releases ago, we tag and ship in -testing and -release repositories only runtime dependencies. There are some packages which are only required to build packages which are tagged in -el8-build tag to be available during building in CBS and are also shipped in build-deps repository in RDO Trunk server, i.e.:
https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-ussuri/build-deps/latest/
I'd propose you to use or mirror that repository or you can find the list of packages and download them from CBS in rdoinfo data file for the specific tag:
https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/blob/master/buildsys-tags/cloud…
I hope this helps, let me know if you need further assistance.
Best regards,
Alfredo
Kind regards,
Jose Castro Leon
CERN Cloud Infrastructure Team
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel(a)centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org>
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel(a)centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org>
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
Hi,
This recipe worked like a charm, but now we are seeing again the same issue, openstack-macros is no longer available in ussuri nor in train
Could you please tell me what happened?
Cheers
Jose
-----Original message-----
From: Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <amoralej(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 1:52 PM
To: The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel(a)centos.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Missing dependencies while rebuilding OpenStack packages
Hi,
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:44 PM Jose Castro Leon <jose.castro.leon(a)cern.ch <mailto:jose.castro.leon@cern.ch> > wrote:
Hi Cloud SIG,
With every OpenStack release (and also with CentOS 8), we have to rebuild some OpenStack packages to be installed at CERN.
Those packages carry downstream patches for integration into our environment. While building those, we have
observed that there are some packages that are required to build but are not provided in the testing repositories.
In the past, there was a build repository in which those dependencies were available. If I recall correctly from a previous
discussion, this is no longer available due to several reasons.
Would it be possible to have the dependencies available in the testing repo at least to build the main OpenStack components?
If this is not possible, what would be your suggestion to help us out?
Since some releases ago, we tag and ship in -testing and -release repositories only runtime dependencies. There are some packages which are only required to build packages which are tagged in -el8-build tag to be available during building in CBS and are also shipped in build-deps repository in RDO Trunk server, i.e.:
https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-ussuri/build-deps/latest/
I'd propose you to use or mirror that repository or you can find the list of packages and download them from CBS in rdoinfo data file for the specific tag:
https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdoinfo/blob/master/buildsys-tags/cloud…
I hope this helps, let me know if you need further assistance.
Best regards,
Alfredo
Kind regards,
Jose Castro Leon
CERN Cloud Infrastructure Team
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel(a)centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org>
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
Hello,
what is timeline or current state of CentOS 8.2?
For CentOS 8.1 I watched https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8.x,
but for CentOS 8.2 I don't found something like this.
Thanks,
Filip Bartmann