Hi Hubert,
On 01/14/2011 04:59 AM, Hubert Bahr wrote:
From my perspective:
- 5.6 impacts existing installs
- 5.6 and updates contain security issues
A different perspective. RHEL-5, CentOS-5 no matter what point change is essentially obsolete. Thus the need for RHEL-6, CentOS-6 which are actually a couple of years late. How much has changed form 5.5 +
That makes perfect sense - however, its not a case of one or the other, its just a case of which one we get out of the door first. Also, since the QA team is largely a different set of people helping out with CentOS-6 and the infra team, there might be a a bit of potential to keep more people busy productively through the next few weeks if we were to get the 5.6 isos and tree over into QA first.
Lets see if we can get a decision on irc later today. The over whelming requests seem to be to get 5.6 out first, but its always good to talk about - there are valid points in either direction.
- KB