On 06/17/2014 11:13 AM, Jeff Sheltren wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
hi,
So we now have RHEL media, RHEL optionals and RHEL Extras. Optionals and media seems to tie in as before, however Extras has its own policy + lifeterm etc.
Thoughts on what we might do with those rpms ? I'd have though that putting them in CentOS-Extras would line up nicely. Content that is available out of the blocks to anyone with a CentOS install, but not themselves included in the distro.
thoughts ?
I like that approach. If these packages actually have different lifetime expectancies, may change versions, etc. I think putting them in Base could be problematic. CentOS-Extras seems like a good compromise. Is there any reason these might need to be separated from what was historically in CentOS-Extras?
+1 to CentOS-Extras here as well.