On 01/12/2016 11:58 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 12/01/16 03:51, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
should centos-release-scl not have at least a "Obsoletes: centos-release-SCL" statement?
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/extras/x86_64/Packages/centos-release-SCL-... vs http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/extras/x86_64/Packages/centos-release-scl-...
And a "Provides: centos-release-SCL", for people like me with "mock" configurations that used it.
honza can shed a bit more light on this, but it was discussed before the first SCL release - and it appeared to not be needed, as new users would just migrate over.
We discussed this topic, but haven't closed it IIRC. New users won't need it, correct. But I remember we said the old users would probably expect centos-release-SCL will be replaced by centos-release-scl automatically. So, it still seems something we should change.
This couldn't be done before the first release, because all the collections weren't released at that point. Now, I believe we can add the Provides/Obsoletes bits into centos-release-SCL. Let's discuss this on the meeting tomorrow.
Honza