El Reg's articles should always be read with irony attitude enabled. However, the topmost comment (containing "dinosaur outlooks" words) brings a familiar refrain.
And yes, Brian Exelbierd's "comment to comments" would be fine to know.
On 27.01.2021 06:21, redbaronbrowser via CentOS-devel wrote:
The Register has an article about CentOS: https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/26/killing_centos/
My best guess is the title and how the quotes form the interview was
framed in the article wasn't what Red Hat expected. Maybe the reader should be taken with a grain of salt.
I am posting it here for a number of reasons:
First, my guess is the majority of members of centos-devel mailing list
have already seen the article or would have seen it regardless of if I posted the link to it here.
Second, I think it would be good to give someone from Red Hat a chance to
respond to if there is inaccuracies in how the article characterizes things.
Third, is this how we expect governance of Stream to work moving forward?