On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 10:14 AM Florian Weimer fweimer@redhat.com wrote:
During the board meeting, the naming issue was re-raised; “x86 SIG” just isn't that great. So I'd like to propose “x86-64 SIG” instead, with a hyphen. We use “x86_64” in the RPM architecture name and configure triplets, but only because we must, as “-” is consindered a separator in these contexts. The official vendor-neutral architecture name is x86-64.
During the meeting, I was under the impression that the board was leaning towards a narrow scope, but that is not quite what the posted minutes reflect. Per Fabian's announcement, we have at least a bit of wiggle room for non-x86 ISA experiments in CBS (ThunderX2 has LSE atomics support). Personally, I'm not interested in such experiments at this time, though. But we could call the SIG “ISA SIG” to keep open the possibility for non-x86 work, if that's what people want.
Thoughts?
I'd be cool with calling it the ISA SIG. For now, we can constrain it to x86_64 stuff, but in the future, I could envision others looking at POWER and zSystems ISA bumps too, since those happen too.
-- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!