-----Original Message----- From: centos-devel-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-devel-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Matt Hyclak Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 10:29 AM To: The CentOS developers mailing list. Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Back-port md raid1/10 BIO_RW_SYNC patch for DRBD
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 09:49:37AM -0500, Ross S. W. Walker enlightened us:
-----Original Message----- From: centos-devel-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-devel-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Johnny Hughes
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 3:39 AM To: CentOS-Devel Subject: RE: [CentOS-devel] Back-port md raid1/10 BIO_RW_SYNC patch for DRBD
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 14:47 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: centos-devel-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-devel-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ross S. W. Walker Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 9:22 AM To: The CentOS developers mailing list. Subject: RE: [CentOS-devel] Back-port md raid1/10 BIO_RW_SYNC patch for DRBD
-----Original Message----- From: centos-devel-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-devel-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Johnny Hughes
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 6:15 AM To: CentOS-Devel Subject: RE: [CentOS-devel] Back-port md raid1/10
BIO_RW_SYNC
patch for DRBD
<snip> > > Does that make a difference, will yum recognize it as a > upgrade or dependency from the current version? > > Also I didn't install the standard kernel I did a yum update > from 2.6.9-42.0.8.plus.c4smp and it went ahead and installed > the standard? > > Maybe the mirror hadn't received all the updates yet and it > decided the standard was the best candidate?
It was the mirror having not sync'd up all the updates.
I did notice something, that might have been true before, but just noticed now. The kernel development headers are marked as upgrades to the previous ones so you can only have one installed at a time.
That makes it hard to compile kernel drivers for previous versions you may have installed if you need to revert back to the previous version.
That is true, and is how the version of YUM is written that is included in c4 ... you can fix this issue with this line in your yum.config file (all one line):
installonlypkgs=kernel kernel-smp kernel-devel kernel-smp-devel kernel-largesmp kernel-devel-largesmp kernel-hugemem kernel-hugemem-devel
Thanks, mate, that should help.
So the above option will make sure that the kernel-devel*
are included in the installonly algorithm.
Is there an option to select how many previous installonlys
are to be allowed? I looked in the man pages, but didn't see the option there. I just want to bump it to 3 from 2.
I believe there is an installonlyn plugin you could probably get.
Matt
Hmmm, I suppose you mean outside the CentOS repo, as I looked in there and found fastestmirror, protectbase, priorities, but no installonly :-(
I want to try and avoid Frankensteining my setup, especially for such a small item.
Nah, I can live with only 2 kernel versions,.
-Ross
______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof.