On 15 martie 2014 01:44:53 EET, Stephen John Smoogen smooge@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 March 2014 17:32, Manuel Wolfshant wolfy@nobugconsulting.ro wrote:
On 15 martie 2014 00:44:29 EET, Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
How would this apply to something like EPEL, which in el6 has XFCE packaged. Would it be acceptable to pull that in, or would that
simply
count as 1 of the 3?
That was something that I figured would also need to be planned for. Where do these packages live? Who is caring for them? My initial viewpoint
is
that it would be nice if the people on a desktop were co-maintainers
on
the package set if it were in EPEL.
Beware that - leaving sponsorship aside - becoming an EPEL maintainer implies accepting the Fedora EULA. I know of people who refused to
/could
not become Fedora contributors because they could/would not accept
that
license.
I don't know of a Fedora EULA (which would be an End User License Agreement). There is a Fedora Contributor Agreement
Right, my bad. That's what I meant.
which replaced a different one (Fedora ICLA) which did have the stigma you listed above .
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Fedora_Project_Contributor_Agreement
Most of these rules seem to be common sense ones..
I agree with you, but common sense has different meanings for different people, though.