23 Mar
2011
23 Mar
'11
10 a.m.
On 03/23/2011 10:52 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:46:21AM +0100, carlopmart wrote:
I know that SL includes some custom components like OpenAFS in their distribution, but base system is the same as CentOS. Then, I repeat, why not?
Because unless something has changed SL does not profess to be binary compatible with upstream
Are you sure?? What does it means "binary compatible" for you?? To me it means that the software "foo" works perfectly on both distros. And all the software I've tried, commercial and GNU, it works in both distributions with the same mistakes and equally effective and performance.
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com