On 04/25/2014 03:14 AM, Karsten Wade wrote:
In that scenario, we accept the huge listing at github.com/centos and point people at the organized centos.github.com page instead.
would'nt git.centos.org meet this requirement ? it can group by teams, by subdir or by tags for individual repos ( allowing users to setup their own 'views' as it were ).
Also, a static pageset will need some level of automation to keep it in sync with the repo states, the git.c.o interface works on the git repos themselves, so as long as its got the github url as an alternate source, it should remain in sync ( but obviously, cant pupp metadata from github, so stuff like pending merge-requests etc will still be only on github )
- KB