On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Julien Pivotto roidelapluie@inuits.eu wrote:
On 12 Nov 12:02, David Moreau Simard wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:37 AM, François Cami fcami@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Version-wise, I plan to deliver 1.9/2.0/2.1/2.2 in separate repositories managed by separate centos-release-ansible-{19,20,21,22} RPMs. Any issue during the build and test phases will be reported here or on IRC. Persistent issues will be posted to the wiki.
Does upstream Ansible even support as far back as 1.9.x and 2.0.x ? Are you going to be shipping what are basically EOL and unsupported/unmaintained versions ?
Looking at releases [1], the last 2.0.x and 1.9.x versions were both in April 2016 -- not /that/ old by any stretch but still old enough to question upstream about their supportability.
It looks like it would be valuable to have an ansible2 tag -- and repo. Because that is what most users will want (we can keep 21 and 22 for power users that want more API compat.).
Noted, thanks for the suggestion.
François
-- (o- Julien Pivotto //\ Config Management SIG V_/_ https://frama.link/cfgmgmt
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel