Il 15/Nov/2016 18:23, "Trevor Hemsley" trevor.hemsley@ntlworld.com ha scritto:
On 15/11/16 16:16, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 15.11.2016 um 15:31 schrieb Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org:
On 15/11/16 13:38, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.8.1.x86_64.rpm 23-Oct-2015 11:19
1.9M
qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm 08-Aug-2016 17:36
2.1M
qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.7.1.x86_64.rpm 03-Feb-2016 16:51
2.1M
qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.10.1.x86_64.rpm 14-Apr-2016 12:16
2.1M
qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm 09-Aug-2016 12:53
2.1M
qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.21.1.x86_64.rpm 24-Aug-2016 13:40
2.1M
are this packages intentional (dist tag diff)?
qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm 08-Aug-2016 17:36
2.1M
qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm 09-Aug-2016 12:53
2.1M
That looks to me like the
qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm 08-Aug-2016 17:36
2.1M
was wrongly named and was then rereleased the following day with the correct one as
qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm 09-Aug-2016 12:53
2.1M
Yes. That's right. And we didn't notice the upgrade issue.
Trevor _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel