Roger PeXa Escobio wrote:
I am gad you agree-accept that the core developers learn a lesson :-), I was a litle sad because I could not see any positive reaction to all our complains and ideas to get both side happy (just one srpm to give two packages)
you seem mistaken about one thing - there really wasent any real userbase problems with this shift. We had hardly any noise at all from the userbase ( remember there are a _lot_ of people using CentOS directly ). The noise came from only a few people.
I can understand also that you make such a public change just when another developer speak :-)
i dont know what you mean by that.
maybe is an effect of "not everybody's words have the same weight". I personally agree with that way of thinking but I beleave if there was one thing that drive people from whitebox to centos at the begining was the strong decision control over the whitebox project that Jonh had and don't want to give away, Centos promise the opposite. It will be sad that that promise just demise over time (across consolidation of the project)
again, i dont know what you are trying to imply here. CentOS isnt a one man setup, and all the developers talk to each other just fine. Whitebox is a one man's part time hobby. I dont even understand how you can compare the two.