The thread has become acrid and non-productive. Maybe start the thread again, only this time without a subject line that implies incompetence and laziness.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Timo Schoeler timo.schoeler@riscworks.netwrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Garry.Dale wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Farkas Levente lfarkas@lfarkas.org
wrote:
<snip> ...and currently everything depend on one single man. that's the main reason why it's takes many months.
Is it possilble to declare this thread officially ridiculous? And shut
it
down?
gd
Why is it ridiculous? Different people asked what facts there might be against opening the development process of CentOS, and mainly those questions where based on the fact that people wanted to *help*. That was their intention.
It was not whining about "when is bla available" etc, like the usual stuff. So, basically, it was a bunch of *valid* questions.
However, all that was replied was "it's never gonna happen" (to be more open) -- why not? -- and "give me 90k GBP and all will be fine" -- what for, salary? Why not purchasing a RHEL license, then?
This was inadequate pseudo answers.
This sounds more like a discussion of a sect or cult than a mailing list of 'the *C*ommunity *ENT*erprise OS. Sorry, but that's more than evident, see the list archive if needed.
Timo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFNJMXwO/2mgkVVV7kRAgJzAJ0YboC6ThJFoZb2CmwJYHNh0PA6kgCfUVMe l1q8srI1jpeCbyjsKjjXOqo= =EBi6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel