Le 09/02/2018 à 18:00, Leon Fauster a écrit :
Honestly, all SCL packages that we (re)build locally, are build with "rpmbuild --define 'nfsmountable 0'" ... (because we do not have such scenario).
IMHO, this option is very badly named (as it doesn't handle the needed "register" stuff)
It should be "fhs_compliance"
With 'nfsmountable 0' every is in /opt /opt/<vendor>/<scl>/root /opt/<vendor>/<scl>/root
With 'nfsmountable 1', you got a better tree
/opt/<vendor>/<scl>/root (read only) /etc/<vendor>/<scl>/ (configuration) /var/<vendor>/<scl>/ (data)
Remi
P.S. with scl-utils v2 you have a "rh_layout" option which gives the same tree, while nfsmountable gives something a bit different :(