I would like to continue this thread under a new subject.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Tetsuo Handa from-centos@i-love.sakura.ne.jp wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 10/27/2011 04:57 AM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
My apologies. I was misunderstanding. I was assuming that making changes in "struct security_operations" breaks the kABI. But it seems it does not.
excellent, lets do it then.
I see. Created http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5219 for this topic.
As can be seen in that bug report, the centosplus kernel has had TOMOYO security module enabled since kernel-2.6.32-131.21.1.el6.
Handa-san, do you think it is a good idea to apply patches [1] referenced on the TOMOYO 2.2 page [2]?
The cplus kernel can easily accommodate patches like that until they eventually appear in the upstream kernel.
Akemi
[1] http://tomoyo.sourceforge.jp/2.2/patches/ [2] http://tomoyo.sourceforge.jp/2.2/install.html.en