On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 9:53 AM Niels de Vos ndevos@redhat.com wrote:
Opinions?
The biggest reason I want to exclude the package server side is that will allow repoclosure to pass for the repo. repoclosure provides me a sanity-check that the entire "product" is installable and I'm not missing any packages. With the way we're growing more and more packages, I want to make this as automated as possible. Ideally repoclosure would automatically gate a package going from -candidate to -testing.
One problem I see with configuring this exclusion client side is that I'm not sure I can rely on everyone using the exact same .repo file. I eventually want to ship packaged mock configs for Ceph, so we'd have to duplicate that there as well :(
I'd like to know if the CentOS admins plan to stay on mash long-term, and if so, let's look into filtering at that level, like Pungi can do. What do you think?
- Ken