Re: [CentOS-devel] including 3rd party repo release RPMs in Extras

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Peter peter@pajamian.dhs.org wrote:

On 04/10/2015 12:17 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:

...

It needs another rule, I thinkk:

* Stable packes do not *obsolete* packages from the standard repositories.

I don't personally have an issue with excluding packages that obsolete core packages, but I can't speak for everyone.

I meant "by default". Thank you for clarifying that.

My main issue (that is now addressed) was to allow packages that replace core packages so long as the repo is disabled by default. The current language allows that and I'm happy with it.

Peter _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel