----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Brooks" jbrooks@redhat.com To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." centos-devel@centos.org Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 4:04:52 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lokesh Mandvekar" lsm5@fedoraproject.org To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." centos-devel@centos.org Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 9:07:12 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS
...
Given the conflicting requirements, would it make sense to have appropriate tags such that, a particular 'docker' (something with RH patches) build only makes it to atomic, while another 'docker' build makes it to virt7-release (only upstream docker sources)
+1
I think it makes sense for everything atomic needs to live in atomic7, and if atomic wants the same version as virt has, great, if not, atomic could have its own.
I just tried a tree compose w/ docker-master, but it Provides docker-io, not docker, so yum's trying to pull in plain "docker" as well, which conflicts...
Jason