On 01/10/2015 12:16 AM, Jim Perrin wrote:
On 01/09/2015 05:48 PM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
I assume the confusion is triggered by us ( me ) recommending something from your personal web site rather than from one "fully blessed " by CentOS ( whatever that would mean )
So, perhaps there's a secondary question worth asking here.
Would a repository of community contributed kickstarts be valuable under the CentOS namespace on github and/or mirrored with git.centos.org?
this question was largely unanswered at the time we did the repo the way it is now..
the problem is - the scope of this would be large enough that anyone can manage it, and everyone can get involved. But I dont want to do this as a part of the Core effort, that closes too many doors. But the SIGs are too specialised in their outlook to curate something of this nature.
The only group in a suiteable place to perhaps take ownership of a resource like that would be the docs group - so we do a community contributed setup there, and the build services retail their own metadata ( which is what the atomic / docker / cloud stuff is ) as and when and where they need it.
We're already publishing kickstarts for docker, as well as some others in https://github.com/CentOS/sig-cloud-instance-build
Perhaps we look at restructuring/expanding that scope?
I dont think we should do that, content metadata for specific roles should stay within those roles. Otherwise were just looking towards running a single svn ( or cvs?) repo with absolutely everything and the kitchen sink in there.