[CentOS-devel] progress?

On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Jeff Johnson wrote:

CentOS may have lost 1 of its vendor-sec representatioves, but its a role that can be re-filled.

Not sure what is meant there, but the vendor-sec process has been relatively quiet of late. Some updates ... thinking here of the recent OpenJDK set ... never passed on that list as to a co-ordinated release date. The real problem in CentOS' presence there is that as the project intentionally 'chases the tail-lights' to follow the upstream, warts and all, we rarely have anything to offer in the vendor-sec list

-- Russ herrold