31 Mar
2008
31 Mar
'08
7:39 p.m.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote: ...snip
Can we just make the .spec build those modules, and ship only the modules in the binary ( would need to also change the name of the package ) ??
iptables-module-<foo> -> would that be a potential name ?
Attached is a new src.rpm for a package that build the extra modules as seperate packages.
Has anyone done a packaging standard for iptables modules before ?
I haven't but the packages are now called iptables-mod-<name> for iptables modules and iptables-ipv6-mod-<name> for ip6tables modules.
Regards, Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven.be@gmail.com - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
"microsoft approach to programming" and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)