On 24/07/2025 21:24, Troy Dawson via devel wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 7:01 AM Davide Cavalca <dcavalca@centosproject.org mailto:dcavalca@centosproject.org> wrote:
On 2025-07-18 06:18, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > * centos-packager > * centpkg These two are still in active use and development. I'm not sure what the final home should be though, Troy do you have a preference here?Sorry, I had talked to Fabian off-list, but I'll reply here.
- centos-packager
- centpkg
- centpkg-minimal
These are all individual packages not related to a SIG, similar to packages on pagure.io http://pagure.io. So they shouldn't go in any SIG area. Fabian said he had a place for repo's that didn't fall into any other category and he could put them there. I said yes, let's put them in the gitlab.com/CentOS/ <http://gitlab.com/ CentOS/><Other> area.
Troy
Yep .. and "naming things is hard [TM]" :D If someone can come with a name for <Other> that would be fine. What about "tools" , or "misc" ? BTW, realizing also that there are others not under /centos/ that would need to move to a specific group/namespace, like for example https://git.centos.org/centos-git-common
PS: I already reimported most of the /centos/* projects on https://gitlab.com/groups/CentOS/archives/git.centos.org/centos/-/inactive (archived) but was wondering if I can already "delete" these from git.centos.org
PS2: another script is actually mirroring /rpms/* content to https://gitlab.com/CentOS/archives/git.centos.org/rpms