13 Dec
2014
13 Dec
'14
3:49 p.m.
On 12/11/2014 12:38 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
Ok, the hash may help in this case to avoid a false package is installed. But isn't it still possible someone asks for just unversioned provide (e.g. 'ocaml(Text)') and expects non-SCL package to be installed?
It seems like everyone's willing to accept this(fix discussion vs acceptance discussion), so what should the repo be named and branched?
--
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77