On 05/19/2014 11:42 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
On 19/05/14 10:23, Bojtos Péter wrote:
Dear All,
Can't we use the packagelist from RHEL 6 as an initial list of packages, which need to be "re-branded"?
Peter
Yes, that would be a good start, indeed. Also worth noting that several packages were modified/patched because of the logo, but *also* for functional changes. As an example, the conga SRPM in el5/el6 has been modified to also roll-in CentOS support (for the ricci/luci nodes) so sometimes "branding" isn't the only thing to search for, but also functional code change required too
I will have 2 things done for today : 1) a guide to what debranding and rebranding implies, along with a broad set of goals to follow
2) a process to whitelist / blacklist; and must-have, good-to-have, nice-to-have, to-have-or-not-to-have list.
We can then co-ordinate the effort off a github repo, we can consider content accepted from github.com to git.centos.org as being the signoff ( we can have acl's that allow a larger group to facilitate this )
regards