23 Mar
2011
23 Mar
'11
11:55 a.m.
On 03/23/2011 11:48 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:43:53AM +0100, carlopmart wrote:
Both statements says the same with different words ... SL says "compatible" too, like CentOS ...
Honestly... This is a development list. If you need to have the concept of binary compatibility explained to you then I fear you are in the wrong place.
Honestly ... I know the meaning of the concept of "binary compatible". I don't understand is where you see the difference between CentOS and SL about this. Where is the difference?
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com