Good evening,
A few words to my repository. First I have gstreamer in as far as multimedia enabled so totem most, or all mine, Fromat plays off.
Driver section was necessary because I installed Centos on flexible media and wanted to access the latest drivers. And yes it works to 99%. At Home, on my laptops and business pc.
I have created the Repostorie to have a backup. Why should I not make my work available? Why should not others benefit from it and when they need it?
Why not fedora?
Have no desire to reinvent my desktop every 18 months. In the past, I had the opportunity to get evolution in the version 3.4 under Centos 6 with gnome 2.34 to run, because I am professionally connected to an exchange. And also this has worked with the keyring of gnome 2.3. Funny, isn't it?
Who likes to sit alone at home and strive for a "his" stablies, usable system. I do not like the copyright of Ubuntu. Sometimes I get on better with RPMS.
What would I like to do better with it? A matrix over the repository is built on. You can only use Drivers and the rest not. Wine, however, needs almost everyone. And who adds the repository "Other" just like "gnome mutter" with patched shadows.
Therefore, a matrix would be cool.
Good night.
Andy
Am Montag, den 06.02.2017, 12:00 +0000 schrieb centos-devel-request@centos.org:
Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to centos-devel@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-devel-request@centos.orgYou can reach the person managing the list at centos-devel-owner@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..."
Today's Topics:
- Re: test builds on private server (drivers, kernel, media, mesa, winehq, java) (Akemi Yagi)
Message: 1 Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 11:20:21 -0800 From: Akemi Yagi amyagi@gmail.com To: "The CentOS developers mailing list." centos-devel@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] test builds on private server (drivers, kernel, media, mesa, winehq, java) Message-ID: CABA31DqUi9qXywUU+j=FKg8wr2FgN5msmGxX10AAz-1_T5vxvQ@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Andreas Benzler andreas@benzlerweb.de wrote:
Hello Guys,
this is a duplicate from the standard centos@centos.org mailing list.
MIght be interest for a developer. Thanks ...
from christmas till now I updated follow packages in my privated builds:
http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/
Drivers: libdrm 2.4.75 (update) vulkan 1.0.3
Kernel: 4.9.1 & firmware (update)
Media: Kodi 17.0 + pvr addons & vlc 2.2.4 (update)
Mesa: 13.0.4 with d3dadapter and vulkan (update)
WineHQ: wine 2.0.1 & wine-stage 2.0.1 (update), winetricks
http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/java/
Oracle Java 1.8.0 121 Netbeans 8.2.1
Sincerely
Andy
PS: This are no signed packages, but the source
I assume you are offering those packages for public consumption, not building just for personal use. If this is the case, I'd like to suggest that you use a unique tag for your packages rather than the .centos tag.
In the past i was think about to take another tag for the packages and to sign that.
But unfortunately my leisure time is limited and therefore I have not implemented it so far. Pick my rpm up. change it and let him run through mock. Everyone by hand.
Regarding the kernel, I see that it was rebuilt from ELRepo's kernel-lt with modification(s). You may want to provide details on how your kernel is different from kernel-lt [1] or kernel-ml [2] and how you plan to maintain it.
Everybody can use elrepo. I built it most time vanille, but got it handy in the "box".
[1] http:elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-lt [2] http:elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml
Akemi
Subject: Digest Footer
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
End of CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 144, Issue 5