Ok, the details are:
checking for flex... flex checking whether flex is recent enough... no configure: error: Your flex version is too old. Please install flex version 2.5.33 or newer.
So I guess you build a newer version of flex in order to build a newer version of wine, right ?
I have been playing with the idea myself to have a separate 'build' repository in RPMforge that replaces a few of the 'older' buildtools. It would allow us to rebuild some software without pulling new requirements that replace base packages.
(flex and make come to mind, there were a few others)
It could be:
.rf. rpmforge stable .rfb. rpmforge buildtools .rft. rpmforge testingWhat do people think ?
-- -- dag wieers, dag@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
It required a newer flex version to build. I took the fedora 7 version, which is new enough and it installs on centos 5.5 without complaining for dependencies. If you do some patching to the official version, it also requires a newer autoconf version.
Also for instalation it requires nss-mdns package, which i got from ATrpms.