On 02/06/14 08:04 PM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
On 06/03/2014 02:47 AM, Jim Perrin wrote:
On 06/02/2014 05:22 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
- To remove ambiguity downstream as to where and what the code
represents. This includes replacing strings that brand a component to be a part of RHEL. eg: if something says 'the xxxx for Red Hat Enterprise Linux' we would replace that to say 'the xxxx for CentOS Linux'
Some notes to keep in mind while you go through stuff to check for branding issues : a) we are not trying to replace (c) Red Hat, or things where it says its Red Hat influenced, like the 'gcc -v' string
With these in mind, do we care about virt-manager, where it lists RHEL as a default install option? Should we amend that to be RHEL/CentOS, or leave it as-is?
</devil's advocate>
it depends on how much fate you have in the users. I've seen someone asking once in #centos what option to use for virt-install since he only had "rhel", "fedora" .....
You can't make things idiot proof... I would suggest that confusion was a good chance for providing insight to the user on the nature of RHEL vs. CentOS. I think it's find to not specifically name CentOS, personally.