On 10/25/2018 03:11 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 10/25/2018 07:45 AM, Harry Mallon wrote:
Sorry to reply to myself. I have found the bug tracker and lots of related, open, bugs.
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=8659 https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14775 https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13197 https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14774 https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14761 https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14776 https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14777 https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14776
Many of these may be obsolete.
Best, Harry
On 25/10/2018, 13:33, "Harry Mallon" Harry.Mallon@codex.online wrote:
Hi all, I am trying cockpit on CentOS 7. 1. Cockpit-system v176 install subscription-manager by default. This is very annoying on CentOS as I do not have a subscription and do not want one. 2. Cockpit-system v176 has cockpit-sosreport rolled into it. However, the rpm does not have the sos package required as it should do. Who makes the packages for the "extras" repo? Is there a better place to report these issues?The packages in question come from this source code:
https://git.centos.org/summary/rpms!cockpit
The original sources are in rhel-7-extras
We have to de-brand / modify the packages, here are the commits for that:
https://git.centos.org/log/rpms!cockpit.git/c7-extras
If you look at the actual commit for the debranding, I added in the step that normally gets rid of subscriptions .. (line 42 of the commit):
https://git.centos.org/commitdiff/rpms!cockpit.git/fc6cf2b2c9befc6fea436bc8c...
Now we need to figure out WHY the require for subscription-manager is still there.
Let the troubleshooting begin :)
This link is the actual spec used: https://git.centos.org/blob/rpms!cockpit.git/c7-extras/SPECS!cockpit.spec
hmm .. looks to me like cockpit-system should NOT require subscription-manager .. but it does :(