5 May
2011
5 May
'11
5:58 p.m.
On 05/05/11 16:42, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 05/05/2011 04:15 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
- ntp-4.2.2p1-9.el5.src.rpm ==> ntp-4.2.2p1-9.el5.centos.src.rpm
- ntp-4.2.2p1-9.el5_3.1.src.rpm ==> ntp-4.2.2p1-9.el5.centos.1.src.rpm
- ntp-4.2.2p1-9.el5_3.2.src.rpm ==> ntp-4.2.2p1-9.el5.centos.2.src.rpm
- ntp-4.2.2p1-9.el5_4.1.src.rpm ==> ntp-4.2.2p1-9.el5.centos.1.src.rpm
is that what really happened ?
Yes, and as a result CentOS released ntp-4.2.2p1-9.el5_4.1.src.rpm as ntp-4.2.2p1-9.el5.centos.2.1.src.rpm because you couldn't release it according to your versioning scheme because in this case it's broken.
But I wrote all this perfectly clearly in my previous mail, and you know exactly what happened so I don't really see the point of your question other than to avoid addressing the issue?