On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 17:41 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
The spec is included in-line, below. The src rpm is here (I will eventually be removing it):
Update:
I still haven't figured out how to handle the "group does not exist" error. I'm considering not bothering with trying to fix it since it's not a real problem anyway. Good idea or bad?
%changelog
- Wed Mar 25 2009 Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu ranbirsandhu@globalive.com -
2.1.3-1.1
- initial CentOS 5 release
- Thu Dec 4 2008 John Dennis jdennis@redhat.com - 2.1.3-1
- upgrade to latest upstream release, upstream summary follows:
I'm not sure how to handle the versioning. Should I do what I've done above (add a .1), or leave the version at 2.1.3-1, and just note that it's the intial Centos 5 release based on the Fedora 10 SRPM (see below)?
- initial CentOS 5 release (rebuilt from Fedora 10 SRPM)
I don't know what the best option is.
Regards,
Ranbir