Re: [CentOS-devel] RH patches v/s vanilla docker in CentOS

On 04/21/2015 12:05 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:

Which is why I thought we want RH type behavior (ie patches) on both our fast moving and RHEL Atomic Host downstream branches for C7. We need stuff that works correctly with SELINUX and systemd on CentOS-7. So, IMHO, we want newer docker and RH patches.

I certainly do - it doesn't make sense to me to have a faster moving Atomic missing the RHT patches and then put them into the rebuild. Let's be consistent as much as possible.

Now, what the virt-SIG does is really up to them, maybe they intend to always ship vanilla upstream -- which is fine, but IMO it would make more sense to have a consistent story as much as possible.

Best,

jzb