Hi,
first I'd like to thank you for finally provinding C5.6!
After updating several servers to C5.6 I checked the installed RPMS against the list of update announcements from upstream. Some updates seem to be missing and some seem to have package naming issues:
Missing updates:
- libuser C5.6 as of today has libuser-0.54.7-2.1.el5_4.1 Upstream announced libuser-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2 (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0170.html)
- java-1.6.0-openjdk C5.6 as of today has java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.16.b17.el5 Upstream announced java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.17.b17.el5 (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0176.html) Upstream announced java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.18.b17.el5 (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0214.html) Upstream announced java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.20.b17.el5 (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0281.html)
- tomcat5 C5.6 as of today has tomcat5-5.5.23-0jpp.16.el5 Upstream announced tomcat5-5.5.23-0jpp.17.el5_6 (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0336.html)
- postfix C5.6 as of today has postfix-2.3.3-2.1.el5_2 Upstream announced postfix-2.3.3-2.2.el5_6 (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0422.html)
- dhcp C5.6 as of today has dhcp-3.0.5-23.el5_5.2 Upstream announced dhcp-3.0.5-23.el5_6.4 (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0428.html)
For the following I'm not sure if these are really missing updates or just different namings in the upstream and Centos RPMS:
- openoffice.org C5.6 as of today has openoffice.org-*-3.1.1-19.5.el5_5.1 Upstream announced openoffice.org-base-3.1.1-19.5.el5_5.6 (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0182.html)
- subversion C5.6 as of today has subversion-1.6.11-7.el5 Upstream announced subversion-1.6.11-7.el5_6.3 (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0327.html)
- libvirt C5.6 as of today has libvirt-0.8.2-15.el5.3 Upstream announced libvirt-0.8.2-15.el5_6.3 (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0391.html)
- glibc C5.6 as of today has glibc-2.5-58 Upstream announced glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2 (https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0412.html)
Can someone please clarify this?
Thanks, Bernd.