23 Dec
2008
23 Dec
'08
1:34 a.m.
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Ned Slider wrote:
I agree with Dag that solution providers shouldn't be able to sell it as CentOS if it clearly isn't because they've modified, disabled or removed key parts of the system.
ok, so lets be clear about one thing - no-one except CentOS.org can distribute anything called 'CentOS'. Everything else is just 'derived from, based on, using parts of, inspired from etc.
Agreed - I think the gripes I see mainly stem from hosting providers selling solutions that are based on CentOS as CentOS... the /based on/ seems to get forgotten somewhere along the line. Their not distributing it, just selling a solution using it or based on it.