1 Nov
2007
1 Nov
'07
1:21 a.m.
Hi,
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
- We build it now against 5.0 and Tag it accordingly, and then rebuild it
when 5.1 is out and then change Tag to 5_1. It will be a different RPM and would involve most uses doing two updates.
As ugly as it is - this should be what to do. Yes, it sucks. Hard. But security updates aren't updates to wait upon.
Yes, thats what I thought as well. The only major issue is that we have extra rpms for cups-*-el5_0*.rpm knocking about for i386/x86_64 that wont exist upstream at all.
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq