On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Sam Kottler s@shk.io wrote:
On 5/6/14, 8:10 AM, Shake Chen wrote:
Hi
Now the image whether support resize?
CentOS can provide rpm for https://github.com/flegmatik/linux-rootfs-resize?
How is it different from cloud-initramfs-tools? If you're interested in having included a repo, it seems like EPEL is the right place.
have same feature with cloud-initramfs-tools, let image can been resize.
now cloud-initramfs-tools only in Fedora, I hope can include in EPEL repo.
I think the cloud image need include Cloud-init，cloud-utils and cloud-initramfs-tools.
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Sam Kottler <s@shk.io mailto:s@shk.io> wrote:
On 5/5/14, 11:31 PM, Juerg Haefliger wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Sam Kottler <s@shk.io <mailto:s@shk.io> > <mailto:s@shk.io <mailto:s@shk.io>>> wrote: > > > > During the cloud instance SIG meeting today we talked about future plans > > for cloud-init in CentOS. Right now cloud-init is included as part of > > EPEL and that's where most CentOS users consume it from. The problem is > > that cloud-init and related bits are critical for building images to run > > on a public or private cloud, and we need to build early guest > > initialization tools into the cloud images we produce. Ideally this does > > not include adding EPEL or packages from EPEL which have not been > > rebuilt in our build systems. > > > > So, the proposal that there's general consensus upon within the SIG is > > to maintain cloud-init, its dependencies, and any related packages on > > git.centos.org <http://git.centos.org> <http://git.centos.org> and rebuild them ourselves. > I'm one of the maintainers in > > EPEL so I offered to maintain the git repos for CentOS, anyone else who > > would like to be involved in more than welcome to step up. > > I'm the EPEL maintainer of cloud-utils and cloud-initramfs-toolsand
> I'm willing to maintain those packages and their dependencies for > CentOS with the goal to keep them in sync. Awesome, thanks! > > ...Juerg > > > Thoughts, questions, concerns? > > > > -s > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS-devel mailing list > > CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org> <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org>> > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel-- Shake Chen
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel