On Feb 23 18:13, Honza Horak wrote:
I'm about to submit a couple of requests into bugs.c.o to create necessary infrastructure for collections from RHSCL-1.2 at least. But first I want to make sure about the tag and branches names.
Currently we have some testing build tags: scl6-el6-mariadb100-build scl7-el7-mariadb100-build and branches in dist-git (in sclo project): scl-mariadb100-el6 scl-mariadb100-el7 And the SIG has codename 'sclo'.. So, it's kind of messy already in the beginning :)
Thinking about keeping it simple and uniform, what about this way:
Keep 'sclo' as SIG codename to indicate it's combination of SCL on openness :)
+1 from me on this. It makes sense to use the actual sig codename.
CBS build tags in format like: sclo6-mariadb100-build sclo7-mariadb100-build and branches in dist-git (in both sclo and rpms projects): sclo6-mariadb100 sclo7-mariadb100
In the client tools, there shouldn't be anything that would hold this up. As long as we remain consistent we can make the mappings work.
This mail is to check whether we're fine to go this way or if there are some limitations we need to follow.
dist-git and CBS gurus, please, provide your PoV. Thanks!
Honza
Is your proposal to rename the existing mariadb tags and git branches?
--Brian