Le 12/08/10 12:56, Dag Wieers a écrit :
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 11:52 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
(flex and make come to mind, there were a few others)
Yes!!!
Latest autotools, flex / bison, static packages for unsatisfiable dependencies such as curl, qt etc. All of this has no place in the standard base repository.
It could be:
What do people think ?
From the aestetical point of view what bothers be is that rf is just 2 characters, while the rest is 3 characters long :-)
But on the upside, you shouldn't see those on "normal" systems :-)
Which reminds me that I also did the proposal of creating an "extras" repository, so:
.rf. rpmforge stable (additional packages) .rfb. rpmforge buildtools (buildtools, not required) .rft. rpmforge testing (test stuff, no guarantee).rfx. rpmforge extras (packages replacing base)
Not sure if rfx/extras is a good name for that repository.
.rfp. rpmforge plus, as centosplus, seems better for me.
JML
If we decide to do this, I guess we should start identifying those packages that replace base, or require packages that replace base.