Hi Milan
well, I see your name since the day when whitebox was an starting project but I certainly remember you from the messages you wrote when John had problems tring to keep whitebox updated (and creating others WB arch) I am sure your intentions are the best, always to help peoples, to help a project to become a better project :-) http://beau.org/pipermail/whitebox-devel/2004-January/000721.html
I guess you want the same for the CentOS project but it is the way you chose to express your intentions, your help. you always make the others get angry with you!!! and then, all the good that your messages could be had, its gone. I am nobody, it looks that you had done a lot more things than me, so you have more credicts in the comunity that the ones that I could have, but all of this will not matter if you keep writing-talking the way you are doing
take the advice please, all of us will win :-) roger
--- Milan Ker¹láger milan.kerslager@pslib.cz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:35:21AM -0400, Matt Hyclak wrote:
Building broken kernel is WRONG. The kernel
crashes and you know about
it but do not build the kernel correctly. The
kernel does not follow 'as
close as possible' RHEL. This is wroong too as
you may read in this
thread.
And how can you prove that building the kernel
with a BETA toolchain will
not result in a broken kernel as well? Maybe it
fixes your problem - if
that's the case, feel free to get the BETA
toolchain and rebuild for
yourself. Johnny has stated that he will continue
to use the STABLE,
RELEASED toolchain. End of discussion.
Johny know better tahan people from kernel team from RH what compiler is better to use to build kernel. Probably. He is the God. Probably.
But still building broken kernel and do not follow your own rules - as you wrote here - to be as close as possible to RHN.
So why do you have a rules? To use the against other. Probably.
So what are you doing guys? Rules that you are
do not follow but talking
about following the rules? This is very very
sad.
What rule are you referring to? The goal is to
make CentOS as *close* to
binary compatible as possible, but there is also
the goal to make CentOS
self-hosting - something that RedHat thus far has
not done.
If you know where the source is and you are
unable to grab them, write
to me - simple script is able to put them to any
FTP site. I'm using
CentOS and RHN too to give back to Red Hat at
least a little.
As do many CentOS developers and users. Would you
like a cookie?
Please end this discussion, it will fall on deaf
ears until RedHat releases
their toolchain as stable.
The tool is stable to build kernel. See their kernel.
-- Milan Kerslager E-mail: milan.kerslager@pslib.cz WWW: http://www.pslib.cz/ke/ _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
__________________________________________ RedHat Certified Engineer ( RHCE ) Cisco Certified Network Associate ( CCNA )
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com