On 2 July 2014 03:38, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
On 07/02/2014 10:31 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 02/07/14 09:23, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
On 06/25/2014 04:50 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Note: this tree now has a centos-release that implements the scope of change we were talking about in the numbering thread. I went through quite a few permutations and what we have here seems like the best middle ground to be on. I am also going to try and circle back to some of the RH folks to make sure they are ok with how we message around where the CentOS Linux release is built from.
Still looking for feedback here - were pretty much at release grade at this point and the number conversation needs to close off before we can push to prod.
The tree's from the last few days have still implemented the 7.1406 scheme with almost no feedback, but for us to move forward we need a +1 vote from people here.
-1
the other scheme that is also on the options is the 7-0-1406 and 7-0-core-1406
I assume you mean 7.0-1406 and 7.0-core-1406 here?
no, we've never actually done a .anything relese, refer back to the centos-release rpms from the last 10 odd years :)
eg: centos-6 is at the moment : 6-5.11.2
Ohhh. you know if I had realized that was what you were talking about this whole time :).
7-core-1406
[though I would prefer 201406]
and your bikeshed needs to be pale yellow.