-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 22/09/15 16:52, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 21/09/2015 16:12, Haïkel a écrit :
Hi,
Since the CentOS acquihire, there was a lot of discussion about EPEL's future. Since the FOSDEM meetup between Fedora/CentOS folks, there was little progress on that topic
Just enable EPEL in CBS, and that's all.
Remi.
P.S. and explain to SIG member how to contribute to EPEL. _______________________________________________
Well, adding so EPEL directly into cbs would then mean that all packages/repositories from cbs would have a hard require on epel too .. not something that target users would probably want (for packages conflicting/updating epel packages)
What I'd be in favor of (short-term) would be more or less something like this : a cbs-epel target and rebuild (and keep in sync) epel packages in that target. Then, SIGs users/maintainers can just "tag" the builds already there (and that they'd like to see landing in their SIG repo) : mash will then generate correct repositories with repo closure without a hard dep on epel itself.
That's just a "wild" idea (after a Rochefort beer ...), but I'd like to think a little bit more about that (and after having discussed with some people about the technical aspects)
- -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab