On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 12:29 PM Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 04:34:53AM -0500, Mark Mielke wrote:
- Minor release milestones to stabilize branches. We have breakage
with most minor release upgrades, and the stabilization process is an important method of isolating users from being affected by this. This is why CentOS 8 Stream is being said "for developers", while RHEL 8 would be "for production". It is being said, because it is a real thing. If you truly believed minor release milestones were unnecessary for CentOS 8 Stream, then you would also believe that minor release milestones were unnecessary for RHEL 8.
It's important to note that the CentOS Linux rebuild never actually had this. RHEL minor releases are actually branches, and you can stay at a minor release and still get security updates. For CentOS Linux, a minor release is a point where updates pause for a while while the team scrambles to rebuild a large update of many packages and then those packages all updated in a big chunk _on the single CentOS branch_. So this is always been extra value that Red Hat Enterprise Linux provides that CentOS Linux did not
Am I missing something? The last time I stared at RHEL release media the packages and their versions were a one-for-one match to the CentOs point release, except for the CentOS-only packages such as "epel-release" and packages with distinct trademarks or licenses. It's been a couple of years since I grabbed RHEL release media, I usually use a licensed RHEL OS image as needed these days. Are you saying the CentOS point releases do *not* match as closely as possible the corresponding RHEL point release?