On 14/07/14 11:10, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 07/14/2014 08:54 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
Well, it crashes for me .. I'll compare the packages list you have used, as it seems less than the normal @core minimal set, which was supposed to be the target (well, in fact *more* packages than just @core, as some deps are needed when using luks/mdadm/btrfs/mdadm, and so on ...) I'll come back with a list and also reading the whole thread about packages people were mentioning
crashes where / how ? A couple of us have run the installer without a problem, and the installed rpm set matches what one gets from the DVD and Everything installs.
we've got mdadm and the fcoe and iscsi content in there, but hopefully enough people can test this and we can get the rest of the bits in as well.
crashing however is not good,
I've started from scratch a list on my side (feel free to compare with the previous ones used/sent to the list) and I attach it to that mail (see minimal.list)
I've then composed an ISO image : 635M Jul 15 14:58 CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-minimal.iso
With that ISO images, I've installed (I've modified the comps to only show "Minimal" - @core) on a small VM with two local disks (700Mb) and one 10Gg iscsi disk
- /boot/efi -> single partition on /dev/sda1 - /boot/ -> ext4 on md device (raid1 on /dev/sda2 and /dev/sdb1) - / -> iscsi-initiator -> PV/VG/LV -> lv_root -> luks encrypted - swap -> lv_swap on the mentioned VG setup - /btrfs -> small btrfs 200Mb partition
I guess we cover quite some options (the only one I haven't been able to test was FCoE, but packages were added)
Repoclosure is also happy with that list : Reading in repository metadata - please wait.... Checking Dependencies Repos looked at: 1 isomin Num Packages in Repos: 318
Cheers,