I like the name server-minimal, or even just minimal for the purpose of what the current version is.
Perhaps this super skinny version ought to be called.. micro?
Dan
On 19 March 2014 16:41, Jeff Sheltren jeff@tag1consulting.com wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
the aim being to setup a base image, that is under 150mb to download and deploy.
I think there are (at least) two different types of "minimal" that could (and should) be provided.
- "working server minimal" which would have at least yum and sshd --
this could be similar to what we do for minimal now, though I'm not totally opposed to shrinking it down a bit more.
- "really really minimal -- and we mean minimal!" -- where the goal is
to strip out as much as possible, no docs, no yum, no ssshd, etc.
I don't have a use for (2) personally, but use (1) -- or at least one of my own making -- quite frequently. I'd be happy if we could keep both.
-Jeff _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel