Le 26/11/10 04:02, Douglas McClendon a écrit :
On 11/25/2010 07:04 PM, Jerry Amundson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Karanbir Singhmail-lists@karan.org wrote:
On 25/11/2010 22:37, Dag Wieers wrote:
and this isnt the rebuilding-rhel-devel-list
It's the closest there is.
that does not make it right or welcome. I made a polite request
In my opinion, it's both right and welcome. This list is my *one* connection to this technical "circle". If I had OP's problem, this is certainly the first list I would look to for an answer. Thinking of the definition of CentOS, if you want no part of a rebuilding-rhel-devel-list, then maybe you should not be on *this* list, or just not be *rebuilding* rhel in the first place, hmm?
Further, you're "polite request" sounds more like passive-aggressive
As an observer who has been entirely guilty of being poisonly dramatic on other fedora-lists, but who has hopefully matured, I have to agree with this. On the other hand I also have to say that Dag's responses were equivalently thoughtless in regard to actually building up the community, instead of just inciting KS to dig deeper into his position.
On the other other hand, that doesn't mean I think those 'thoughtless' comments were wrong. I.e. if KS really does feel that strongly, moderation is the real answer that would facilitate a community without these sorts of non-productive, community-poisoning heal-digging-in drama fests.
$0.02...
-dmc
Each Flag war is shamefull for the protagonists and hurts all the community. I'd rather read some less appropriated topics than I can quickly bypass if I don't feel concerned. Technical debates are welcome, Personal conflicts are unpolite. Centos merits better.
JML