Meetings should cover status - what's been happening, what's planned, and where people can participate. And it's an opportunity for users to complain about what's broken, and ask for help. It is one way to engage with the community, and forces a periodic retrospective and refocusing of the work. It also ensures that this isn't just a couple of engineers doing work inside their company.
I would really want to see the outcome of more frequent Storage SIG meetings. I saw that multiple components in Storage SIG fail when we add SELINUX to the equasion.
Note also that if your SIG prefers to have "meetings" via email, for the benefit of multi-timezone, multi-language participants, I certainly think that's fine too. We have evolved a process where IRC meetings are the norm, but they are certainly not the only way to do things.
So far I was left with the impression that only 3 members are active (Kaleb, Niels and AnoopCS) , but I might be wrong.
Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov